2

April
2004

8:37 PM

Con Boys

Well, that's one mystery solved, and less overtly awful than I feared.

There was a CBC report centred on these lads the other night, and the more I watched the older boy's face the less I believed what he said. What I was afraid of was that he'd killed his parents and dumped their bodies; that he and his brother might be ordinary runaways was more likely but less distressing. What I saw was a boy who enjoys manipulating others and for whom empathy is a foreign concept.

That anyone at the CBC or in the RCMP accepted their story was something I'd discounted from the start; it was romantic enough on the whole but in its details implausible. That two people, even expertly woods-savvy, could homestead and raise children no more than an hour's backcountry walk from Revelstoke with no one knowing they were there for lo these fifteen to twenty years was simply not on. Therefore, they were lying, or rather the older boy was lying; the younger had little to say. Miserable, but not talkative. The way the older was lying, and the kinds of things he chose to say or avoid, led me to think he'd done something terrible.

I'm glad he hasn't, so far (aside from gross abuse of the trust and good will of a number of people in Vernon), and hope he never does. But I expect he will.

comment [3]

--
My god, what a story! Any bets on how long before it shows up on Law and Order?
You mean, before or after Jerry Springer?

There's still more to this. You don't throw a kid out of the house just for refusing to get a job, for one.
Very true, pericat -- there's definitely more to the story than just refusing to work. It was undoubtedly the last straw in a long line of troubles. Quite a few guys with that kind of manipulative, self-seeking personality have come and gone in our group home, and the behaviour pattern definitely seems to be incorrigible by adulthood.

commenting closed for this article

--